Queer-April 16

From reading the two articles, I gather that queer theory is an attempt to undermine the categories that create oppression of sex, gender, and sexuality.  Theory writers are forced to overcome long histories of colonization and gender appropriating verbiage in order to welcome a new age in theoretical discourse, an age that unifies all humans on the continuum of sexuality.  I found the writing in both articles to be rather personal and casual.  I assume this trend fed the theory articulated, especially in that language needs to be more accessible and inclusive if it will be used to describe and understand each other, hence the word "queer."  In addition, the style of writing allows the writers to insert their pronal interventions and stories within their theories, demonstratiing the living embodiment and commonality of queer individuals.  In the critique of boundaries and systems of oppression created by language, Feinberg urges readers to defy the "man-made boundaries of gender"and create a unifying language that empowers the oppressed.  Furthermore, queer theory confirms that time does not always signify social progression.  For example, Feinberg outlines how transgendered individuals were praised as powerful figures before the advent of capitalism.  An immense and complicated history of persecuting and shaming transgendered communities has created a norm of violence toward and oppression of queer individuals.  This shows the queer community is in an even lower position than they were in ancient history.

Notes from discussion:
clothing limits mobility
capitalism has stakes in clothing